~1 min read · 285 words ·updated 2026-04-28 ·
confidence 50%
Q&A — researched answers to user questions
Each entry is a question submitted by the user, followed by a researched answer that either (a) draws directly from the existing KB (with cross-links), or (b) goes to primary sources for new material. Inviolable rule: never invent facts. When a claim cannot be verified, the answer says so explicitly and labels the claim as speculation with a confidence flag.
How an entry is structured
- Question — shown in English (translated if originally asked in another language).
- TL;DR — one or two sentences. The honest answer.
- What’s verified — primary-source-cited facts, with inline citations.
- What’s in the KB already — pointer-links to the relevant existing pages.
- Analysis / interpretation — explicitly labeled inference, with the boundary between fact and reasoning made plain.
- What we do NOT know — the limits of available evidence.
- What to watch — concrete future signals that would update the answer.
- Sources — full URLs at the bottom; archived in
08_sources/source_log.md.
Confidence labelling
| Glyph / pill | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ✓ verified | Multi-source primary corroboration; suitable for citation in thesis files |
| ◐ partial | Single-source or aggregator-level; cross-validation pending |
| ⚠ speculative | Clearly labelled inference or community claim; not promoted to thesis files |
Index
| Date | Question (short) | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | Validate this NVDA + LWLG connection timeline DD post | ✓ 25/29 verified · ⚠ 3 refinements · 0 unverified (VisEra resolved 2026-04-28 — wrong-domain fetch was the prior blocker) |
| 2026-04-28 | POET-Marvell NDA cancellation — link to LWLG-Marvell positioning? | ✓ verified facts + ⚠ explicitly labelled inference |